Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Howell's avatar

The "firefighter" discussion has been percolating around the agencies for a while, back when I was a "Wildland Fire Apprentice" in that area, on the Hume Lake RD of the Sequoia NF (while carrying the designation of "Forestry Technician" lol) - that was 15 years ago.

As for what to call folks involved in prescribed fire, but not wildland suppression duties, I've coined the term "Prescribed Firelighter". Maybe it'll catch on.

The phenology of fire in the Sequoias is such that "early summer" (in the high country anyway) is fairly ideal for a successful burn. Sequoias are a serotinous species and like fire that leaves bare mineral soil - hot enough for the ash to provide nutrient-rich soil for Sequoia seeds to germinate - but not so hot as to volatilize nutrients or render soil hydrophobic.

Smoke of course is a primary concern, but I've posited for years that "no smoke" is simply not an option.

We can burn under conditions favorable for less smoke generation and greater dispersion - or mother nature and human folly can do it under far less favorable conditions such as the regular "summer dome" of high pressure that caps off the SJV and ensures we all marinate in it until the fall rains show up - IF they show up.

I forget what year it was... 13? 14? That we had a couple thousand acre fire way in the back of the Golden Trout Wilderness - in JANUARY.

Expand full comment

No posts