One thing I don't understand is how has it been determined that the sequoias called "dead" are, in fact, dead. Black trunks and all foliage burned away does not always equal dead. But perhaps the forest experts can describe the methodology that determined mortality.
Thank you for publishing the Chad Hanson rebuttal regarding the Camp 70 Foresters claims that you published last week ... I deeply appreciate the balance that is now achieved by the publishing of the CH rebuttal ...
...Notwithstanding the false dichotomy where 'balance' is perceived as the centerpoint of two opinions - lending credence to both regardless of merit. Respect to GSN. Also, lets keep some perspective.
One thing I don't understand is how has it been determined that the sequoias called "dead" are, in fact, dead. Black trunks and all foliage burned away does not always equal dead. But perhaps the forest experts can describe the methodology that determined mortality.
Thank you for publishing the Chad Hanson rebuttal regarding the Camp 70 Foresters claims that you published last week ... I deeply appreciate the balance that is now achieved by the publishing of the CH rebuttal ...
...Notwithstanding the false dichotomy where 'balance' is perceived as the centerpoint of two opinions - lending credence to both regardless of merit. Respect to GSN. Also, lets keep some perspective.
What is your point? No comprendo ...